Since Prince Harry and Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, stepped back from senior royal duties in 2020, public interest in their relationship with the British monarchy has remained high. Headlines often feature strong opinions and dramatic interpretations, but responsible coverage requires focusing on confirmed information from official statements, court records, and established media organizations.
The Decision to Step Back in 2020
In January 2020, Prince Harry and Meghan announced their intention to step back as senior working members of the Royal Family. Their statement was shared via their official website and social media channels and was later followed by an official response from Buckingham Palace.
The Palace confirmed that:
- The Duke and Duchess of Sussex would no longer perform official royal duties
- They would not use the HRH style for professional purposes
- They would become financially independent
- Publicly funded royal security arrangements would be reviewed
Queen Elizabeth II released a statement acknowledging the difficulty of the situation but expressing support for the couple’s wish to build a new life. This statement remains part of the official royal archive and is widely reported by reputable outlets such as BBC News, Reuters, and Sky News.

The Proposal for a Hybrid Role
In their original announcement, Prince Harry and Meghan stated that they hoped to divide their time between the UK and North America while continuing to support the Queen in some capacity. This proposal became commonly known in the media as a “half in, half out” model.
However, Buckingham Palace later clarified that such an arrangement would not be possible within the structure of the monarchy. The Palace’s official statement emphasized that working royals must avoid conflicts of interest and operate under clear institutional boundaries.
This remains the formal and publicly documented position of the Royal Household.

Prince Harry’s Public Statements
Prince Harry has shared his perspective through several on-the-record platforms, including:
- His interview with Oprah Winfrey (2021)
- The Netflix series Harry & Meghan (2022)
- His memoir Spare (2023)
- Interviews with ITV, CBS, and other established broadcasters
- Court testimony during legal proceedings involving media organizations
Across these appearances, Harry has stated that:
- He found royal life emotionally challenging
- He disagreed with aspects of the institution’s response to media coverage
- He remains committed to his family relationships
- He hopes for reconciliation in the future
These are his own words, documented in reputable media and court records.

The Palace’s Official Position Since 2020
Since the departure of the Sussexes from working royal life, Buckingham Palace has issued only limited public statements regarding them. This follows a long-standing royal approach of minimizing commentary on private family matters.
What is verifiable:
- The Sussexes are no longer working royals
- They do not represent the monarch in official duties
- Royal patronages previously held by them were reassigned
- Their participation in major royal events (such as the Coronation) has been limited and clearly defined
There has been no official announcement from Buckingham Palace suggesting a change to this arrangement.

Public Opinion and Polling Data
Public opinion regarding Prince Harry has been measured by established polling organizations such as YouGov and Ipsos. These organizations publish transparent methodologies and are regularly cited by major news outlets.
Their findings indicate that public sentiment toward Prince Harry in the UK has fluctuated over time, particularly following high-profile interviews and the publication of Spare. However, public opinion does not determine royal policy and should be understood as a reflection of societal attitudes rather than institutional decisions.
Legal Actions Against Media Organizations
One area where Prince Harry has been actively involved in recent years is legal action related to press practices. He has brought cases against several media groups, including Associated Newspapers and News Group Newspapers.
These cases involve allegations of unlawful information gathering and privacy violations. They are documented in:
- UK High Court proceedings
- Reporting by BBC News, Reuters, The Guardian, and The Times
- Official legal filings
Some elements of these cases are ongoing, while others have resulted in rulings or settlements. This legal activity is verifiable and part of the public record.
Understanding the Structure of the Monarchy
The British monarchy operates under constitutional conventions rather than personal preference. Experts from institutions such as:
- The Institute for Government (UK)
- King’s College London
- University College London’s Constitution Unit
have consistently explained that:
- Royal roles must be clearly defined
- Working royals must remain politically neutral
- Commercial activity must not conflict with institutional responsibilities
This framework explains why the Palace rejected a hybrid working model in 2020. These are structural principles, not personal judgments.
Family Relationships Remain Private
While public interest in the personal relationships within the Royal Family remains intense, very little verified information exists about private conversations or emotions. What can be confirmed includes:
- Prince Harry attended King Charles III’s coronation in May 2023
- He has traveled to the UK for court hearings and official matters
- He has publicly stated his wish for reconciliation
- The Palace has avoided commenting on private family matters
Anything beyond these facts becomes speculative and should be treated cautiously.

Where Things Stand Today
Based on publicly available, reliable information:
- Prince Harry is not a working royal
- There is no official indication of a return to royal duties
- He continues independent professional work in the United States
- He remains involved in legal cases concerning media practices
- He has expressed a desire for improved family relationships
These points reflect documented facts, not speculation.
Conclusion
The story of Prince Harry’s relationship with the Royal Family is often portrayed in emotional or dramatic terms. However, when viewed through a responsible, fact-based lens, the situation becomes clearer and more balanced.
Prince Harry made a public decision to step back from royal duties. The monarchy responded by establishing firm institutional boundaries. Both sides have spoken publicly in different ways, but the official framework has remained consistent since 2020.