AC. Homosexual prisoners bewildered upon discovering German soldiers for the first time in…

In the historical accounts of survivors who endured the concentration camps of the 1940s, a specific, recurring memory often outweighs the descriptions of physical toil or hunger. It is a moment of profound psychological confusion that occurred at the very threshold of the camps.

For Julien Mercier, a young Frenchman arriving at Sachsenhausen in September 1943, this “moment of arrival” would haunt him for half a century. It was not the sight of the barbed wire or the harsh barks of the guards that disoriented him; it was a phenomenon known as Die Auswahl—the selection. But this was not the infamous sorting for labor or the gas chambers. It was a subtle, predatory evaluation that revealed a deep hypocrisy within the paramilitary ranks of the Third Reich.

The Arrest of Julien Mercier

Before the war, Julien was a celebrated aesthetician and hairdresser in Lille. He was a man of art and social grace, but he carried a personal secret that, under the atmospheric dread of occupied France, was a death sentence. In August 1943, an anonymous denunciation brought the Gestapo to his salon. Following weeks of interrogation, he was forced into a cattle car, bound for an unknown destination.

When the doors finally groaned open at the camp ramp, Julien and eighty other men were pushed into the blinding daylight. Amidst the chaos of the “Raus, raus!” shouts, Julien noticed a group of soldiers who stood apart. They were silent, observing the new arrivals not with the typical mask of hatred or boredom, but with an intense, evaluative interest.

Julien recognized that look. It was a gaze he had encountered in the discreet, underground social circles of pre-war Paris—the look of recognition and desire. To see this in the eyes of the men representing the regime that sought to “purify” society of people like him was a staggering contradiction. He felt a chill of intuition: he had entered an “inverted world” where the persecutor and the persecuted shared the same nature, but only one held the power of life and death.

Có thể là hình ảnh đen trắng

The Pink Triangle and Block 18

During the registration process, the prisoners were stripped of their identities and marked with colored symbols. Julien was given the Pink Triangle—the badge assigned to those categorized by the regime as “socially deviant” due to their orientation.

He was led to Block 18, a barracks isolated from the political and common prisoners. That evening, a Kapo (a prisoner supervisor) announced that some men would be selected for “special service.” Shortly after, an officer named Hauptsturmführer Werner Hartman entered, accompanied by a young soldier with strikingly clear eyes named Müller.

Hartman methodically inspected the line of men. He stopped before Julien, whispered to Müller, and made a notation. Julien was one of eight men ordered to follow them out into the dark.

The Paradox of the “Special Program”

The men were not led to the quarries, but to a clean, well-lit building equipped with luxuries unimaginable in the main camp: hot water, fresh bread, cold cuts, and real beds. The following morning, Hartman explained the terms of their survival.

“The Reich has a problem it does not admit,” Hartman stated coldly. “Among our ranks are men who share your condition. These are good soldiers and administrators we cannot afford to lose. Their needs must be managed and controlled.”

Julien realized with a sickening clarity that he was being recruited into a clandestine system of exploitation. The “special service” was to satisfy the clandestine needs of high-ranking officers and guards who were themselves “deviant” by their own laws. The choice offered was brutal:

  1. Acceptance: Access to food, shelter, and a reprieve from the death-traps of the rock quarries.

  2. Refusal: Immediate return to the general population with a life expectancy of mere months.

Of the eight, only a philosophy professor named Henry refused, choosing to maintain his dignity at the cost of his life. He died three weeks later. Julien, driven by a desperate instinct to survive, stayed.

The Case of Soldier Müller

Julien was primarily assigned to Müller. The young soldier was a study in self-loathing. He performed his duties in total silence, treating Julien like a nameless object. However, as months passed, the facade began to crack. One evening, Müller broke his silence, revealing a childhood spent in the Hitler Youth and a father who would have killed him had his nature been known.

“I am doing my duty,” Müller insisted, though his hands trembled. “You persecute me for what I am,” Julien countered, “while using me because you are exactly the same.”

Müller’s response was a haunting admission of the psychological trap of the era: “I don’t live with it. I survive, like you.”

Julien began to see that Hartman’s program was not an isolated incident. It existed across multiple camps, created by men like Hartman to protect themselves. It was a system where the Nazis transformed their own self-hatred into absolute power over their victims. They didn’t see their prisoners as fellow human beings; they saw them as mirrors they needed to shatter or tools they could use.

The Death March and Liberation

In April 1945, as the Allied forces closed in, Sachsenhausen was evacuated. In the chaos, Müller found Julien one last time. He handed him a small, yellowed card with an address in Hamburg. “This is my sister. If you survive, she will help you,” he said. When Julien asked his name, the soldier finally replied: “Carl.”

The ensuing “Death March” toward the west claimed thousands of lives. Julien, weighing only 41 kilograms (about 90 lbs), survived through sheer willpower. He was eventually liberated by American troops near Schwerin.

Post-War Silence

Julien returned to a France that was not ready to hear his story. In 1945, those who wore the Pink Triangle were not recognized as victims of the conflict; in many places, they remained subject to the same discriminatory laws that had existed before the war. Julien reclaimed his life in the shadows, working quietly as a barber, never speaking of the “inverted world” he had inhabited.

He kept Carl Müller’s card in a drawer for fifty years—a relic of a moment where a persecutor acknowledged their shared humanity.

A Legacy Documented

It wasn’t until 1995 that Julien finally shared his testimony with a young historian. His account provided crucial insight into a phenomenon that historians had long ignored: the clandestine exploitation of prisoners by guards who shared their orientation.

Julien’s “perplexity” at the ramp became a vital historical record. It demonstrated that evil is not always a simple, external force; sometimes, it is the result of a profound internal conflict. The regime’s most “efficient” killers were often men at war with their own natures, projecting their shame onto their victims to prove their loyalty to a distorted ideal.

Julien Mercier died at age 81, six months after speaking his truth. He left behind a lesson that extends beyond the history of the 1940s: that even in the deepest darkness, a small gesture—a name, an address, a moment of eye contact—can affirm that we are, above all else, human beings.

Julien’s story remains a testament to the complexity of the human spirit and a warning against the ideologies that force individuals to hate themselves—and subsequently, the world around them.